Neufmois.fr » Au fil de l'actu » James Van der Beek est papa pour la cinquiĂšme enfant

James Van der Beek est papa pour la cinquiĂšme enfant

L‘acteur de la sĂ©rie phare des annĂ©es 2000 Dawson, vient d’annoncer sur son compte Instagram l’arrivĂ©e de son cinquiĂšme enfant. A l’occasion de la fĂȘte des pĂšres, James Van der Beek a prĂ©sentĂ© son bout de chou, une petite fille.

La famille s’agrandit pour James Van der Beek

L’heureux papa a prĂ©sentĂ© la petite derniĂšre de la famille Ă  tous ses fans sur Instagram, Gwendolyn. Une de plus dans la fratrie qui compte dĂ©sormais cinq enfants. Avec sa compagne Kimberly Brook, l’acteur de Dawson a dĂ©jĂ  eu quatre enfants. Olivia 7 ans, Joshua 6 ans, Annabel 4 ans et Emilia 2 ans. Le vendredi 15 juin, sa femme a donc accouchĂ© d’un cinquiĂšme enfant, une quatriĂšme fille. Comme le dit l’acteur sur sa publication Instagram « pile Ă  temps pour la fĂȘte des pĂšres« . Dans ce post, l’homme de 41 ans fait une dĂ©claration Ă  celle qui partage sa vie depuis huit ans et qu’il Ă©pousĂ© en IsraĂ«l, Kimberly Brook « Tu es une p*tain de dĂ©esse rock star et je suis autant impressionnĂ© par toi que je suis amoureux » . De son cĂŽtĂ©, Kimberly Brook a aussi partagĂ© de tendres clichĂ©s de James Van der Beek avec ses enfants sur son compte Instagram. Elle a tenu a lui souhaiter une joyeuse fĂȘte des pĂšres et a ajoutĂ© qu’elle « n’avait besoin de rien d’autre » que de sa famille. DĂ©couvrez les photos de ces 5 tĂȘtes blondes avec leurs parents juste ici.

Thrilled to announce we welcomed a brand new baby girl into the world Friday morning, just in time for #FathersDay ? These last few days, as I’ve enjoyed the privilege of making smoothies I know my older kids will like, making my wife red raspberry leaf tea to ease her uterine contractions, spending “boy time” with my son and getting my two year-old down for a nap in the way only I know how… I’ve been heart sick about something. As I write this, kids are being ripped from the arms of their parents. By our government. For the kid’s benefit? No – the opposite – as a purposeful display of cruelty to deter would-be illegal border crossers AND legal asylum seekers (it’s happening to both). And it wouldn’t be honest to wax poetic about my new-baby bliss without speaking up against this atrocity. If we allow our government to de-humanize fathers, and mothers, and children in the name of defending our borders… we’ve lost a huge part what makes those borders worth defending. And even if you don’t believe in karma, or in extending basic human decency to people who didn’t win the geographic birth lottery… even if you’re hard-liner enough to say, “Break the law, suffer the consequences,” shouldn’t the punishment at least fit the crime? And if you’re still cold enough to say, “Well, it’s effective,” consider this: This heinous practice was put into place by our own attorney general (who justified it with a cherry-picked Bible verse), and our president blamed rivals before tweeting his list of legislative demands to be met before he stops it. Regardless of how you feel about immigration, or a wall, or this president… if we say we’re okay with our government using human rights violations as a deterrent or as a bargaining chip… what happens when we find ourselves on the wrong side of the agenda? Either in this administration or the next? This should not be a political issue – it’s a human one. A crime against humanity is a crime against us all. More info in link in my bio. Oh, and @vanderkimberly – you’re a f*cking earth goddess rock star and I’m as in awe of you as I am in love with you. And our new baby’s name is Gwendolyn ❀ #HappyFathersDay everybody.

A post shared by James Van Der Beek (@vanderjames) on

À lire absolument